• Login
    View Item 
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.) Collections
    • View Item
    •   Mak IR Home
    • College of Health Sciences (CHS)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.)
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.) Collections
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of buccal midazolam to rectal diazepam in the treatment of prolonged convulsions in children at Mulago Hospital

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    mpimbaza-arthur-chs-masters.pdf (2.398Mb)
    Date
    2007-04
    Author
    Mpimbaza, Arthur
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    INTRODUCTION: Convulsions continuing for five minutes or longer are common in children in sub-saharan Africa and are medical emergencies. We compared the efficancy and safety of rectal diazepam and buccal midazolam in the treatment of prolonged convuasions. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of buccal midazolam as compared to rectal diazepam in the treatment of prolonged convulsions. METHODOLOGY: A single blind randomized clinical trial was conducted in the paediatric emergency unit in uganda’s national referral hospital. Consecutive patients aged 3 months to 12 years who presented with a convulsion of greater than five minuted were randomized to receive buccal midazolam (0.5mg/kg) plus rectal placebo or rectal diazepam (0.5mg/kg) plus buccal placebo. This study was registered and thetrial number is: (http://www.controlle-trials.com/ISRCTN13964268/Training+in+malaria+research+in+uganda). ANALYSIS: Data was analyzed using SPSS version 10.0 and STATA version 8.0. The Mann- Whitney test was used to compare medians, and the chi- square test to assess for the relative risk of failing treatment. Multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for treatment failure and recurrence of convulsions. ETHICS: Written consent to continue participation in the study was sought from the legal guardian after the child had received treatment. RESULTS: Data was analysed as intention to treat. Treatment failures occurred in 71 of 165 who received rectal diazepam (43.0%) compared to 50 of 165 who received buccal midazolam (30.3%; RR 1.42, 95% C1 1.06- 1.89, p= 0.016). The rate of respiratory depression was low and similar in the two treatment arms. CONCLUSIONS: Buccal midazolam was safe as and more effective than rectal diazepam for the treatment of convulsions in Ugandan children. RECOMMENDATIONS: Buccal midazolam should be considered as a potential alternative for rectal diazepam in the treatment of convulsions in Ugandan children.
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/10570/216
    Collections
    • School of Medicine (Sch. of Med.) Collections

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of Mak IRCommunities & CollectionsTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy TypeThis CollectionTitlesAuthorsBy AdvisorBy Issue DateSubjectsBy Type

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Most Popular ItemsStatistics by CountryMost Popular Authors

    DSpace 5.8 copyright © Makerere University 
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    Atmire NV