Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMagezi, Adam
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-06T14:08:20Z
dc.date.available2023-11-06T14:08:20Z
dc.date.issued2023-10-27
dc.identifier.citationMagezi, A. (2023). Statistical Lagragian characterization of the steady ABC and meandering jet flows. (Unpublished Thesis). (MakIR). (Msc. Physics). Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10570/12338
dc.descriptionA Thesis submitted to the Directorate of Research and Graduate Training for the award of a Degree of Masters of Science in Physics of Makerere University.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we carried out a statistical Lagrangian characterization of the steady ABC and Meandering jet flows. The ABC flow is a three-dimensional velocity field which gives rise to chaotic trajectories while the Meandering jet flow is a two-dimensional velocity field capable to mimic the meanders of a western boundary current. The two flows are chosen to capture the chaoticity of dynamic flows in both two and three dimensions. The stirring metric used are the Finite Time Lyapunov Exponents (FTLES) and the Finite Size Lyapunov Exponents (FSLEs). Probability distribution functions (PDFs) of FTLEs and FSLEs are calculated and their moments are used to check for similarity and/or discrepancy of the two metrics. The motivation for the study is that both FTLEs and FSLEs are used synonymously in the analysis of the stirring effected by fluid flows with limited information about their similarity. The FTLE and FSLE fields are proxies to passive tracers which are used to track flow with their numerical values representing tracer oncentrations. These two flow diagnostics are considered to be similar and the choice of which one to use depending on the background and scientific community of the user but this presumption is just arbitrary since there is no scientific proof for it. In this study, we found out that the PDFs of both the two dimensional meandering jet flow and the three dimensional ABC flow are consistently non Gaussian. The non Gaussian nature of the PDFs took us to the conclusion that the diffusive parameterization schemes should not be used in numerical weather predictions. It was also found that the PDFs of FTLEs and FSLEs are distinctly different giving differing values of their respective higher order moments. We conclude that FTLEs and FSLEs can be considered similar for only visualization purposes. In studies involving accuracy measurements and quantification of stirring, the two metrics are not synonymous.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMakerere University.en_US
dc.subjectStatistical Lagragianen_US
dc.subjectsteady ABCen_US
dc.subjectmeandering jet flowsen_US
dc.subjectStatistical Lagrangian characterizationen_US
dc.titleStatistical Lagragian characterization of the steady ABC and meandering jet flows.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record